Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0221130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221130

Table 4. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio of algorithm set E.

Algorithm No. TP FN Weighted FP (Net FP) Weighted TN (Net TN) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) DOR (95% CI)
E0279 10 3 14.72 (1) 1457.28 (99) 76.9 (49.7–91.8) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 40.5 (23.7–59.8) 99.8 (99.4–99.9) 330.00 (82.31–1323.06)
E0591 10 3 14.72 (1) 1457.28 (99) 76.9 (49.7–91.8) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 40.5 (23.7–59.8) 99.8 (99.4–99.9) 330.00 (82.31–1323.06)
E0624 11 2 14.72 (1) 1457.28 (99) 84.6 (57.8–95.7) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 42.8 (25.9–61.6) 99.9 (99.5–100.0) 544.50 (110.85–2674.68)
E0720 10 3 14.72 (1) 1457.28 (99) 76.9 (49.7–91.8) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 40.5 (23.7–59.8) 99.8 (99.4–99.9) 330.00 (82.31–1323.06)

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio.

Only algorithms with the same or higher performance than Algorithm D02 are shown.