Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 19;8:e45952. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45952

Figure 2. Comparison of transcriptional and translational effects of the evolved mutants and correlation with relative fitness.

(A) The schematic shows the sites of YFP insertion for transcriptional and translational fusions. The plot compares maximum YFP expression (± SEM) from transcriptional and translational YFP fusions at the Tn7 site for the WT (n = 14 replicates) and evolved mutants (n = 7, 7, and six technical replicates, respectively). Significance with respect to transcriptional fusion: ***p<0.001. See Figure 2—source data 1. (B) Linear regression of fluorescent signal of YFP transcriptional fusions as a proxy for transcript levels and relative fitness measures for a subset of synonymous mutations (n = 27). Grey shading indicates the 95% confidence interval for the regression (adjusted R2 = 0.69, p<0.001). See Figure 2—source data 2. (C) Expression of transcriptional YFP fusions inserted across the gts operon of evolved mutants. Maximum fluorescence (± SEM) of the YFP transcriptional fusions at different loci in the gts operon relative to SBW25. See Figure 2—source data 3; YFP fusion positions are depicted in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 2—source data 1. YFP expression for transcriptional and translational fusions after gtsB at the Tn7 site.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45952.006
Figure 2—source data 2. YFP expression for transcriptional fusions after gtsB in the native site for a subset of synonymous mutations.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45952.007
Figure 2—source data 3. YFP expression for transcriptional fusions across the gts operon.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45952.008
Figure 2—source code 1. Source code for Figure 2C: analysis of YFP expression and fitness.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45952.016

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Schematic depicting positions of YFP transcriptional fusions within the native gts operon.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure