Table 3.
Overall (N=88) | Delirium (N=20) | Non-delirium (N=68) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|
Baseline ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 22 ± 11 | 15 ± 5 | 0.005 |
Follow-up ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 40 ± 23 | 27 ± 17 | 0.002 |
ADL declinea (points), median ± IQR | 16 ± 15 | 9 ± 15 | 0.037 |
Proximal femoral nail (n=47) | Delirium (n=13) | Non-delirium (n=34) | P Value |
Baseline ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 23 ± 10 | 15 ± 4 | 0.002 |
Follow-up ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 43 ± 21 | 28 ± 16 | 0.001 |
ADL declinea (points), median ± IQR | 18 ± 15 | 10 ± 12 | 0.041 |
Hip replacement (n=37) | Delirium (n=6) | Non-delirium (n=31) | P Value |
Baseline ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 20 ± 14 | 16 ± 7 | 0.432 |
Follow-up ADLs (points), median ± IQR | 33 ± 24 | 27 ± 19 | 0.147 |
ADL declinea (points), median ± IQR | 12 ± 13 | 7 ± 14 | 0.283 |
Open reduction and internal fixation (n=4) | Delirium (n=1) | Non-delirium (n=3) | N/Ab |
ADL decline was calculated by using follow-up ADLs score minus baseline ADLs score, which indicated the decline of activities of daily living. The larger ADLs change score indicates the greater ADL decline.
There was only one in four participants who had developed postoperative delirium after open reduction and internal fixation surgery at the time of follow-up evaluation. Thus, we did not determine the association between postoperative delirium and the decline of ADL in these participants.
Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold. ADL, activities of daily living; IQR, interquartile range; N/A, not applicable.