Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;9:11791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48071-x

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The NALCN current for wt, Y578S and L509S variants is potentiated in low extracellular Ca2+ with no change in reversal potential. (A) Representative traces obtained on cells held at −40 mV (HP) during application/wash of an extracellular Na+-free solution (replaced with NMDG) with high (2 mM) or low (0.1 mM) extracellular Ca2+ for a mock (NLF1)-transfected cell, a NALCN/NLF1 (wt)-transfected cell, a NALCN CLIFAHDD mutant (L509S)/NLF1-transfected cell, and a NALCN CLIFAHDD mutant (Y578S)/NLF1-transfected cell. (B) Density of the external Na+-dependent background current (Na+-free) with high (2 mM, filled bars) or low (0.1 mM, hatched bars) extracellular Ca2+ for mock (NLF1)-transfected cells (−0.008 ± 0.029 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 2 mM and −0.073 ± 0.028 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 0.1 mM, n = 9, P = 0.136), NALCN/NLF1 (wt)-transfected cells (−0.303 ± 0.046 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 2 mM and −0.712 ± 0.115 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 0.1 mM, n = 9, p = 0.004). NALCN CLIFAHDD mutant (L509S)/NLF1-transfected cells (−0.529 ± 0.148 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 2 mM and −1.347 ± 0.188 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 0.1 mM, n = 16, P = 0.001), and NALCN CLIFAHDD mutant (Y578S)/NLF1-transfected cells (−0.792 ± 0.126 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 2 mM and −2.466 ± 0.415 pA/pF in [Ca2+]e = 0.1 mM, n = 16, P = 0.001). Statistical significance was calculated with an unpaired student’s t test (C) I/V relationship in the −30 mV to + 30 mV range of the Na+-dependent component recorded in low concentration of extracellular Ca2+ (0.1 mM) of wt NALCN (n = 8), NALCN-Y578S (n = 12) and NALCN-L509S (n = 18) currents. (D) Mean reversal potential (ERev) of the Na+-dependent component of wt NALCN (Erev = 36.55 ± 12.91 mV, n = 8), NALCN-Y578S (Erev = 40.22 ± 2.99 mV, n = 12) and NALCN-L509S (Erev = 46.22 ± 4.70 mV, n = 18) currents. Each dot represents the ERev of 1 cell. For each cell, the ERev was calculated from the linear part of its I/V relationship as illustrated in (C). Statistical significance was calculated with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.