Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;8(8):e00818. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.818

Table A2b.

Comparison of protease activity in relative fluorescence units

ANOVA Post hoc test
Size Mean Std Dev t p
Filtrates of day 0 (df = 7; F = 2.967; p = 0.141)
S. costatum 3 539 483.9
S. costatum +K. algicida 3 1,134 640.4
K. algicida in sea water 2 2,142 1,145.5
Filtrates of day 5 (df = 8; F = 70.613; p < 0.001) Holm‐Sidak (all pairwise) α 0.05
S. costatum 3 851 738.5 S. costatum versus S. costatum +K. algicida 11.5 <0.001***
S. costatum +K. algicida 3 12,057 1897.6 S. costatum +K. algicida versus K. algicida in sea water 8.334 <0.001***
K. algicida in sea water 3 3,939 352.5 S. costatum versus K. algicida in sea water 3.170 0.019*
Filtrates of day 10 (df = 8; F = 36.111; p < 0.001) Holm‐Sidak (all pairwise) α 0.05
S. costatum 3 1,064 1,226.6 S. costatum versus S. costatum +K. algicida 8.473 <0.001***
S. costatum +K. algicida 3 7,188 636.6 S. costatum +K. algicida versus K. algicida in sea water 4.810 0.006**
K. algicida in sea water 3 3,712 664.4 S. costatum versus K. algicida in sea water 3.663 0.011*

Averaged blank values for protease activity of sea water were subtracted before one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. Background subtraction resulted in one negative value (S. costatum with day 5 filtrates) which was set to zero.

Level of significances:

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.0001.