Table 2.
Methodological quality of studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Study | Cheng | DIAZ | Dong | Li | Maierthaler | Roh | Toiyama | Yu | Shelton |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Selection of the non-exposed cohort | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Ascertainment of exposure | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Assessment of outcome | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | - | ☆ | - | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | - | - | ☆ |
| Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | - | ☆ | - | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | - | ☆ | - |
| Stars | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 |