Table 2.
Study | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | Quality scores |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tsuyoshi Etoh | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
Kwi-Sook Choi | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 |
Philip Chiu | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 |
Dae Yong Kim | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 19 |
Takeshi Yamashina | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 |
Ju Choi | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 |
Chan Park | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 |
Young Kim | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 |
Sara Najmeh | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 |
A, Clearly stated aim; B, Inclusion of consecutive patients; C, Prospective collection of data; D, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; E, Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint; F, Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study; G, Loss to follow up <5%; H, Prospective calculation of the study size; I, An adequate control group; J, Contemporary groups; K, Baseline equivalence of groups; L, Adequate statistical analyses. The items are scored 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate), or 2 (reported and adequate).