Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 1;199:730–744. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.045

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

This figure provide an example of the extrinsic connectivity architecture used in this sort of DCM – and the particular network or graph used in this paper. Here, we have selected three regions that comprise an early visual source (V1), a motion sensitive area (V5 or MST) and an attentional area; the frontal eye fields (FEF). Forward connections arise primarily from superficial pyramidal cells and target spiny stellate cells in the granular layers. In addition, we have modelled a (lower density) connectivity to deep pyramidal cells. Backward connections arise from deep pyramidal cells and target inhibitory interneurons and superficial pyramidal cells. The laminar specificity of these extrinsic connections is specified quantitatively by the prior expectations of the connectivity parameters in the lower equalities. In addition to specifying the extrinsic connectivity architecture, it is necessary to specify where experimental inputs drive or modulate neuronal responses. Here, visual input, visual motion and attention drive responses in the early visual cortex, motion sensitive cortex and frontal eye fields respectively. Crucially, attention exerts a modulatory effect on the self-inhibition of superficial and deep pyramidal cells in the hierarchically intermediate area (V5). Our key question was whether the attentional modulation of superficial, deep or both pyramidal populations is necessary to explain the observed data. Please see the tables for a description of the variables in this figure.