Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr 29;123(2):133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.022

Table 2.

Recent studies evaluating maternal diet including or excluding allergenic foods during lactation (+/− pregnancy) and FA/sensitization in offspring

Citation, location Number of subjects§ General population or high risk for atopy Exposure Outcome Adequate statistical adjustment Study Design Impact of intake during pregnancy Impact of intake during lactation Comments
Peanut
Du Toit 200866, UK and Israel 176 General population Infant and maternal consumption vs no consumption between countries (Israel vs UK) (grams and frequency monthly) FA (self-report followed by SPT, IgE, or OFC) No Retrospective No association Protective Early infant exposure to peanut showed strongest protective effect
Fox 2009 63, UK
UK
443 2 control groups; a general population group and a high risk (egg allergy) group Maternal consumption vs no consumption (g/week) FA (≥95% predictive value on SPT, IgE or OFC) Yes Case-control No association No association Maternal effect disappeared when adjusted for household peanut exposure
Des Roches 2010 67, Canada
Canada
403 General population Maternal consumption (frequency) FA (clinical history plus positive SPT or IgE) Yes Case-Control Increased risk Increased risk
Sicherer 2010 64, USA 503 High risk Maternal consumption (≥2 times per week vs < 2 times per week) High level sensitization (IgE ≥ 5 kU/L) Yes Retrospective Increased risk No association
Frazier 2014 72, USA 8205 General population Maternal consumption (servings per week) of peanuts and tree nuts during peripregnancy period (exposure captured via survey completed closest to index birth) Physician reviewed self-report FA diagnosis Prospective cohort Protective Did not evaluate lactation and pregnancy separately. Greatest benefit seen in mothers without peanut/tree nut allergy
Pitt 2017 65, Canada
Canada
342 High risk Maternal consumption while lactating (ever vs never) Sensitization (positive SPT) Yes Prospective cohort (nested) Not assessed Protective#
Cow’s milk, egg and others
Herrmann 199668, Germany
Germany
99 -120 High risk Maternal unrestricted vs restricted diet (cow’s milk and egg) during pregnancy and lactation, vs lactation only Sensitization (IgE ≥0.35kU/L) No Non-randomized comparison No association No association
Hattevig 199969, Sweden
Sweden
115 High risk Maternal unrestricted diet during lactation vs restricted diet (cow’s milk, egg, fish) Sensitization (SPT and IgE ≥0.35PRU/ml) Yes Non-randomized comparison Not assessed No association
Nwaru 201170, Finland (DIPP Nutrition study, 1998 – 2000) 1018 High risk for type 1 diabetes (all with HLA-DQB1) Maternal consumption of foods (z-scores) during lactation (milk and egg) Cow’s milk, egg and wheat sensitization (IgE ≥0.35kU/L) Yes Prospective cohort Not assessed No association
Tuokkola 201671, Finland (DIPP Nutrition study, 1997-2004 2820 High risk for type 1 diabetes (all with HLA-DQB1) Maternal consumption of milk during pregnancy and lactation (quartiles – 1st vs 2nd and 3rd, 4th vs 2nd and 3rd) Cow’s milk allergy (physician diagnosis or self-report) Yes Prospective cohort Protective No association Using the same cohort as above study does

Abbreviations: FA - FA, SPT - skin prick test, IgE - immunoglobulin E, OFC - oral food challenge, NS = not significant

§

N included in lactation specific analyses

Includes (at minimum) adjustment for atopic status of family and/or subject if different between comparison groups

#

Among group with maternal peanut consumption during lactation and introduction to infants before 12 months, no adjusted effect estimate reported for peanut consumption during lactation without interaction with direct ingestion because this was highly significant (p = 0.003).

Registry-obtained physician diagnosis used to justify cost of non-cow’s milk formula, or self-report if breastfed or diagnosed at > 1 year of life

DIPP Study - The Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Study