Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;26(5):552–561. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00955-6

Table 2.

Tumor size according to patient presentation

Patient presentation Tumor size on MRI (mm) P value Tumor size on MRI (mm) P value
[Mass + non-mass] [Mass only]
Median Range 0.002* Median Range 0.001*
Self-detecteda (n = 40) 28 (11–82) (n = 39) 28 (16–82)
Detected on MMG or US
 Detected by routine-screening examsb (n = 15) 21 (9–110) (n = 12) 23 (9–110)
 Detected by post-operative contralateral follow-up (n = 2) 17.5 (13–22) (n = 2) 17.5 (13–22)
Detected on MRI
 Detected by post-operative contralateral follow-up (n = 2) 4 (3–5) (n = 2) 4 (3–5)
 Detected by HBOC surveillance exam (n = 1) 7 (n = 1) 7
 Detected on other than MRI for some purposesc (n = 3) 19 (17–57) (n = 2) 18 (17–19)
 Undetectable on MRId (n = 4) 0
 Unknown (n = 5)

MMG mammography, US ultrasonography, HBOC hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

*Statistically significant

aPatients who presented with clinical symptoms (i.e., mass, pain, or nipple discharge); these patients had no prior routine-screening exams, or symptoms occurred between interval screening exams

bPublicly available routine cancer screening in Japan

cThese included two cases for pre-operative contralateral evaluation and one case detected on chest CT incidentally

dTwo patients underwent MRI after US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies, and two breast cancers were diagnosed by CRRM (contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy)