Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;7(14):318. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.63

Table 4. The results of prenatal diagnosis in the AMA women who selected both karyotype analysis and CMA.

Group Classification Simple AMA (n=607) AMA combined with other indications (n=96)
Number Results Number Results
K+C+ Number abnormalities 6 T21 (n=5); 47,XXY (n=1) 10 T21 (n=6); T18 (n=1); 47,XXY (n=3)
Structural abnormalities 2 46,XN,add10(q26); 46,XX,t(2;7)(q13;p22) 0
K−C+ Pathogenic 3 Xp22.31dup 1.68M; Yp11.2q11.23 dup18.72M; Xp22.33p22.31 loss 6.28 M 1 17q12loss1.5M
Like pathogenic 6 12q24.33 dup0.5M; 18q21.32q21.33 loss 2.4M; LOH; Xq27.1 dup 1.32M; 16p13.11p12.3 dup 2.91 M 0
No subclassification 25 3
Like benign 3 1
Benign 2 2
K+C− Number abnormalities 2 47,XN,+21[22]/46,XN[10]; 47,XY,+20/46,XY[44] 0
Structural abnormalities 5 46,XN,add(4)(q12); 46,XY,t(5;16)(q15;p10)[3]/46,XY[47]; 46,XY,add(15)(p13); polymorphism 2 3 45,XX,rob(15;22)(q10;q10); 45,XX,rob(13;14)(q10;q10); 46,XY,9qh+,add(15)(p13)
K−C− 553 76

K+C+, both results of karyotype analysis and CMA were positive. K−C+, the results of CMA were positive, while karyotype analysis were negative. K+C−, the results of were karyotype analysis positive, while CMA were negative. K−C−, both results of karyotype analysis and CMA were negative. CMA, chromosomal microarray; AMA, advanced maternal age.