Table 3.
Section and topic | Item |
---|---|
1: Countrya | EU country the PPI study was conducted |
2: Aim | Report the aim of PPI |
3: PPI term useda | Term used to describe PPI |
4: Populationa | Which patient or public population took part in PPI |
5: Methods | Provide a clear description of the methods used for PPI |
6: Study results | Report the results of PPI on the research process impact on researchers and PPI members, including both positive and negative outcomes |
7: Discussion and conclusions | Comment on the extent to which PPI influenced the study overall |
8: Reflections/critical perspective | Comment critically on the study, reflecting on the aspects of involvement that went well and those that did not |
9: Evaluation methodsa | Methods used to evaluate the impact of PPI on researchers, on patient and public involved, on the research process |
10: Findings from evaluationa | The impact of PPI on researchers, on patient and public involved, on the research process |
(aadapted sections)