Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 15;19:811. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5931-7

Table 3.

Fasting results

Reference (author, year) Design Population (no. of participants, cancer site, treatment) Intervention (DR intervention, corresponding cancer treatment) Feasibility Tolerance Treatment effect
De Groot 2013 and 2015, Netherlands [38, 39] Pilot RCT

13 (7 IG, 6 CG)

IG: Median age 51y (range 47-64y)

CG: Median age 52y (range 44-69y)

Stage 2–3 breast cancer

48 h fast (24 h before until 24 h after start of chemotherapy)

3 weekly (neo) adjuvant TAC-chemotherapy

15% withdrawal NR

↑ median blood glucose (mmol/L); IG: 5.2 to 6.8 (p = 0.042), CG: 4.8 to 7.0 (p = 0.043)

↓ mean IGF-1 (nmol/L) of 17% in IG (23.7 to 19.6, p = 0.012), ↔ CG

↔ median insulin (mU/L) in IG, ↑ in CG group: 2.0 to 16.0 (p = 0.043)

↔ TSH (mU/L) in IG: 1.49 to 0.42, ↓ in CG: 1.38 to 0.61 (p = 0.034)

↔ in IGF-BP3 or FT4

↑ erythrocytes in IG (Day 7: p = 0.007, 95% CI 0.106–0.638; Day 21: p = 0.002, 95% CI 0.121–0.506)

↑ thrombocytes in IG (p = 0.00007, 95% CI 38.7–104) at day 7

↔ leukocytes or neutrophils

↔ self-report side effects

Dorff, 2016 and Quinn, 2013, USA [40] Dose escalation

20

Median age 61y (range 31–75y)

Any cancer

3 cohorts fasted before chemotherapy for 24, 48 and 72 h (divided as 48 pre-chemo and 24 post-chemo)

Platinum based chemotherapy

Adherence: 24 h fast: 67%, 48 h fast: 83%, 72 h fast 57%

Grade 1/2 fatigue, headache, dizziness, hypoglycaemia, weight loss, hyponatremia and hypotension

No grade 3/4 fasting-related toxicities

5% failed to regain 25% of weight lost

↓ IGF1. 24 h fast: Cycle 1: − 30% (− 12 to − 44%) Cycle 2: − 31% (− 45% to − 13%) 48 h fast: Cycle 1: − 33% (− 45% to − 18%) Cycle 2: − 20% (− 37 to 1%) 72 h fast: Cycle 1: − 8% (− 24 to 13%) Cycle 2: 16% (− 5 to − 42%)

↔ glucose

↓ mean insulin. 24 h fast: − 56%. 48 h fast: − 27%. 72 h fast: − 42% at 48 h (data at 72 h NR)

↓ DNA damage in 48 h and 72 h, but not 24 h fast

↓ nausea. 24 h fast: 100%, 48 h fast: 87%, 72 h fast: 43% (p = 0.019)

↓ vomiting. 24 h fast: 83%, 48 h fast: 43%, 72 h fast: 0% (p = 0.003)

↔ neutropenia. 24 h fast: 67%, 48 h fast: 14%, 72 h fast: 29% (p = 0.17)

Mas, 2017, France [41] Qualitative

15

Age NR

Breast cancer

Self-administered fast concurrent to chemotherapy

Main motivation to limit chemotherapy side effects

Effect of fasting on tumour was not a motivation (patients felt cancer-free following surgery)

Offered a chance for ppts to take an active role in treatment

13% reported AEs which stopped them fasting Fasting was a positive experience that reduced the side effects of chemotherapy and reinforced self-esteem
Safdie, 2009 and [42], USA [43] Case series

10

Median age 61y (range 44-78y)

Breast (n = 4), prostate (n = 2), ovarian (n = 1), uterine (n = 1), lung (n = 1), oesophageal (n = 1) cancer

Self-administered fast ranging from 48 to 140 h prior to and/or 5–56 h following chemotherapy NR

Low grade dizziness, hunger, and headaches reported

No grade 3/4 toxicities

Weight loss recovered in “most” patients

↓ in fatigue (p < 0.001), weakness (p < 0.00193) and GI side effects (absent) in 46 reported cycles with fasting compared with 18 ad-libitum cycles

↑ = increase/higher

↓ = reduction/lower

↔ = no change/no difference

Where absolute figures were provided, %s have been calculated to aid comparison

Abbreviations: AEs Adverse Events, CG Control Group, CHO Carbohydrate, DR Dietary Restriction, FT4 thyroxine, GI, gastrointestinal, IG Intervention Group, IGF Insulin-like Growth Factor, IGFBP Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein, NR Not Reported, RCT Randomised Controlled Trial, SAEs Serious Adverse Events, TSH Thyroid Stimulating Hormone