Table 5.
Longitudinal association between woman’s income and past year experience of economic abusea
| Intervention arm (n = 313) | Control arm (n = 274) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past year economic abuse at follow-up n/N (%) | Age-adjusted OR (95%CI) | aORb (95%CI) | Past year economic abuse at follow-up n/N (%) | Age-adjusted OR (95%CI) | aORb (95%CI) | |
| Change in monthly income between baseline and follow-up | ||||||
| Fallen 1+ quartile/stopped working | 38/86 (44%) | – | – | 33/77 (43%) | – | – |
| Stayed in same quartile | 43/96 (45%) | 1.00 (0.58–1.72) | 1.04 (0.55–1.98) | 32/78 (41%) | 0.91 (0.54–1.54) | 0.82 (0.42–1.62) |
| Increased 1+ quartile/started working | 44/112 (39%) | 0.79 (0.51–1.23) | 0.84 (0.54–1.29) | 36/99 (36%) | 0.78 (0.42–1.47) | 0.60 (0.31–1.16) |
aAmong women married/living as married at baseline and follow-up
bAdjusted for woman’s age, partner’s age, baseline measure of outcome, woman’s education, partner’s education, relationship duration, and experience of household-level financial hardship in past year