Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;20:317. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1518-4

Table 2.

Characteristics and results of the studies assessing physical performance with QOL

Author, year Country No. of NHD pts Frequency of NHD treatment Study design, control group Follow-up duration, months Male % Age, yearsa Assessment and outcome Effects NHD
Self-reported measurements
 Hall, 2012 [22] USA, Canada 45 6 times/wk., ≥6 h RCT, CHD controls 12 64 52 ± 14 Physical health composite (PHC) by Short form-36 (SF-36), physical functional subscale (PF) Change PHC after 12 mo NHD: 2.7 ± 1.4 vs control group: 2.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.75, Change PF after 12 mo NHD: − 3.1 ± 3.5 vs control group: 1.1 ± 3.6, p = 0.40.
 Ok, 2014 [14] Turkey 247 3 times/wk., 7–8 h Prospective, non-randomized case-control, CHD controls 12 68 45 ± 14 Physical functioning by SF-36 Described: all dimensions were unchanged in the NHD group. Change in control group: vitality score decreased, 68.7 ± 24.3 to 64.4 ± 25.2, p = 0.01.
 Eps, 2010 [24] Australia 63 3–5 times/wk., 6–10 h Prospective cohort, no controls 6–12 79 52 ± 13 Physical functioning by Kidney disease QoL (KD-QoL) Change in PF after 6–12 mo NHD: 60 to 75, p = 0.003.
 Lockridge, 2004 [25] Canada 40 5–6 times/wk., 6–10 h Prospective, longitudinal, no controls 60 65 50 (23–81) Physical composite score (PCS) by SF-36 Change in overall mean PCS score after 5 yrs. NHD: 35.23 to 44.94, p = 0.007.
 Fong, 2007 [27] Canada 26 Cross-sectional, PD controls 67 4912 Physical component summary by KD-QoL PCS in NHD: 55 ± 2.3 vs control group (PD): 52.3 ± 1.8, p = 0.35.

aAge is given as mean ± SD or as median and IQR