Table 3.
Geographical location of included programsa
| Evaluation n (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation n (%) | Major Cities | Inner Regional | Outer Regional | Remote | Very Remote | Total | Aboriginal population (%)b |
| Major Cities | 26 (32.1) | 26 (32.1) | 37.4 | ||||
| Inner Regional | 10 (12.3) | 10 (12.3) | 23.7 | ||||
| Outer Regional | 14 (17.3) | 1 (1.2) | 15 (18.5) | 20.3 | |||
| Remote | 3 (3.7) | 1 (1.2) | 2 (2.5) | 6 (7.4) | 6.7 | ||
| Very Remote | 15 (18.5) | 6 (7.4) | 2 (2.5) | 1 (1.2) | 24 (29.6) | 11.9 | |
| Total | 58 (71.6) | 10 (12.3) | 8 (9.9) | 4 (4.9) | 1 (1.2) | 81 (100) | 100 |
aExcludes included programs implemented at a national or state level (Home Medicines Review Program [94, 95], Get Healthy Service Program [75], QAAMS Program [77–79] and COACH Program [82]), programs where geographical coordinates were not provided by authors (n = 5) and one program where the evaluation was undertaken overseas as part of a multi-site program evaluation [47]
b2016 Australian Aboriginal population distribution across Remoteness Areas [101]