Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;19:160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0891-z

Table 2.

The results of the covariance analyses for time pressure and psychological distress

Model
Aa
Model
Bb
Model
Cc
F p R2 F p R2 F p R2
Time pressure 0.008
Age 0.03 0.867 1.324 0.250 0.855 0.975
Sex 1.62 0.251 2.347 0.126 2.816 3.213
Employment sector 5.68 < 0.001 5.949 < 0.001 5.990 < 0.001
EHR usability in terms of 0.057
Reliability 24.844 < 0.001 23.749 < 0.001
User-friendliness 14.244 < 0.001 13.384 < 0.001
Impact on quality of service 1.634 0.201 0.097 0.756
Support for cooperation 1.856 0.173 1.262 0.261
Competence related to 0.083
Classification use 0.004 0.950
e-Care 17.585 < 0.001
e-Documentation 3.607 0.058
e-Ethics 0.007 0.932
Psychological distress 0.001
Age 3.64 0.057 6.751 0.009 6.715 0.010
Sex 0.03 0.854 0.070 0.791 0.002 0.968
Employment sector 1.24 0.290 2.079 0.081 1.082 0.364
EHR usability in terms of 0.033
Reliability 5.263 0.022 5.641 0.018
User-friendliness 4.765 0.029 2.236 0.135
Impact on quality of service 1.924 0.166 0.501 0.479
Support for cooperation 12.092 0.001 9.456 0.002
Competence related to 0.056
Classification use 0.334 0.563
e-Care 12.547 < 0.001
e-Documentation 0.020 0.887
e-Ethics 0.625 0.429

aModel A included age, sex, and employment sector.

bModel B included age, sex, employment sector, EHR reliability, user-friendliness, impact on quality of service, and support for cooperation.

cModel C included age, sex, employment sector, EHR reliability, user-friendliness, impact on quality of service, support for cooperation, classification competence, e-care competence, e-documentation competence, and e-ethics competence