Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;12(3):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.07.010

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author & Year Country Continent Mean age ± SD Gender SS NS
Ost genotype
Cont genotype
Ost Cont GG GC CC GG GC CC
Czerny et al., 2010 Poland Europe 63.3 ± 5.1 Female L 226 224 67 126 33 76 103 45
Magana et al., 2008 Mexico America 34.3 ± 10.2 Female S 70 70 56 13 1 42 25 3
Garnero et al., 2002 France Europe 64.6 ± 8.8 Female L 372 255 134 180 58 93 126 36
Deveci et al., 2012 Turkey Europe 57.0 ± 7.0 Female S 201 155 127 50 24 93 31 31
Mendez et al., 2013 Mexico America 58.3 ± 6.8 Female S 180 180 138 37 5 53 95 32
Maedeb 2009 France Europe 70.0 ± 7.4 Female S 92 69 34 47 11 30 30 9
Nordstrom et al., 2004 Sweden Europe 75.0 ± 0.0 Female L 232 544 68 121 43 167 246 131
Lee et al., 2010 South Korea Asia 12.5 ± 1.4 Female S 198 120 197 1 0 119 1 0
Korvala et al., 2010 Finland Europe 20.3 ± 1.6 Male S 72 120 15 42 15 35 56 29
Dincel et al., 2008 Turkey Europe 74.5 ± 8.9 Mixed S 20 17 0 10 10 0 7 10
Ferrari et al., 2004 USA America 60.1 ± 9.5 Mixed L 626 935 206 390 30 360 390 185
Moffett et al., 2004 USA America 73.0 ± 5.0 Female L 2634 742 869 1272 493 245 354 143

Notes USA = United States of America, SD = standard deviation, SS = sample size, L = large (≥400 samples), S = small (<400 samples), NS = number of samples, Ost = osteoporosis, cont = control.