Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 5;15(8):e1007992. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007992

Fig 4. Comparison of viremia in experimentally-infected pigs and poultry using GI and GIII JEVs.

Fig 4

(A and B) Nine specific pathogen free (SPF) pigs (n = 3 per group) were subcutaneously inoculated with 105 ffu of GIII CH1392 virus (Inline graphic) or GI YL2009-4 virus (Inline graphic), or PBS (Inline graphic). (A) The change of each pig’s body temperature before and after viral infection is shown. (B) The viral titer in pig plasma was detected by micro-antigen focus assay at 1, 2, and 4 days post infection (DPI). (C and D) One-day old chickens (n = 4 per group) and two-day old ducklings (n = 4 per group) were subcutaneously injected with 104 ffu of GIII CH1392 (Inline graphic), GIII T1P1 (Inline graphic), GI YL2009-4 (Inline graphic), and GI TC2009-1 viruses (Inline graphic). The viral titer in plasma recovered from JEV-infected chickens (C) or ducklings (D) at 1, 2, 4, and 6 DPI (n = 4 per group) was determined by micro-antigen focus assay. The detection limit is indicated as a dotted line. (A-D) A dot plus a horizontal line represent an individual animal and a mean viral titer (C, D) of the group, respectively. The statistics comparing either two or four viruses were determined by a Student’s Two-Tailed t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s Multiple Comparison Test. The statistical difference was noted by an asterisk (P< 0.05).