Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 27;19(15):3309. doi: 10.3390/s19153309

Table 5.

Classification accuracies for each feature set. The best classification result for each motion within each feature set is in bold.

Feature Set Motions Classification Accuracy (%)
LDA SVM RF
FS4
(MFL, MYOP)
EF 78.4 70.4 63.6
EE 68.5 65.4 67.3
P 71.6 70.4 63.6
S 72.2 71.0 70.4
WF 70.3 70.4 70.4
WE 66.0 60.5 57.4
UD 77.2 79.6 67.3
RD 74.7 69.1 67.9
HC 69.8 69.8 63.6
HO 63.0 70.4 63.6
FS5
(LOG, DASDV, MYOP, MAVS, PSR, AR4, ApEn, MFL, MSD)
EF 61.7 73.5 71.0
EE 75.9 72.8 72.8
P 59.9 66.7 67.9
S 58.0 71.0 67.9
WF 64.8 59.9 69.1
WE 51.9 58.6 63.0
UD 69.1 74.7 64.8
RD 61.1 73.5 67.3
HC 56.2 63.6 67.3
HO 56.8 64.8 60.5
FS5 Optimized with RELIEFF
(PSR, MFL, MSD)
EF 69.8 71.6 64.8
EE 72.5 72.2 75.9
P 72.8 70.4 66.0
S 71.0 72.8 70.4
WF 56.8 69.1 68.5
WE 61.7 66.7 64.2
UD 72.2 76.5 69.1
RD 67.3 64.8 68.5
HC 65.4 71.0 61.7
HO 63.6 66.7 71.6