Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;12(15):2453. doi: 10.3390/ma12152453

Table 1.

Compares undifferentiated iPSC literature by printing type, nozzle diameter, bioink composition, crosslinking mechanism and function.

Printing Technique Printer Nozzle Diameter Bioink Crosslinker Cell Source Function Reference
Drop-on-Demand Custom 3-axis stage 101.6 µm 1.5% w/v alginate 6% CaCl2 hiPSC cell lines RCi-22, RCi-50 N/A Faulkner-
Jones et al.
2015
Extrusion Felix 3.0 40 µm Geltrex None Custom made BJ fibroblasts derived hiPSC 3 germ-layers Reid et al.
2016
3D Bioplotter Envision TEC 200 µm 5% w/v alginate, 5% w/v carboxymethyl-chitosan, 1.5% w/v agarose CaCl2 hiPSCs (source not specified) 3 germ-layers, neural tissues Gu et al.
2017
3D Discovery regenHu 300 µm Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) alginate (60:40) NFC with HA CaCl2 (for alginate)
H2O2 (for HA)
Custom made A2B iPSC line, iPSC derived chondrocytes Pluripotency, chondrocytes Nguyen et al.
2017
Custom-built 260 µm 2% w/v hydroxypropyl chitin (HPCH), 0-30% Matrigel Temperature 37˚C hiPSC from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) Pluripotency Li et al.
2018
Laser-assisted Nd:YAG 1064 laser N/A
Droplet volume 0.01-1nL
1 wt% HA Matrigel - hiPSC from cord blood or peripheral blood-derived hiPSC line 3 germ layers Koch et al.
2018