Table A3.
Drummond Checklist/Study Authors | Anopa, Y. [19] | Blaikie, D.C. [20] | Kowash, M.B. [15] | Stearns, S.C. [18] | Samnaliev, M. [21] | Pukallus, M. [16] | Quinoez, R.B. [17] | Plonka, K.A. [23] | Folayan, M.O. [30] | Takeuchi, R. [22] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was a Well-Defined Question Posed in an Answerable Form? | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Was a Comprehensive Description of the Competing Alternatives Given? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
Was the Effectiveness of the Program Established? | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
Were All the Important and Relevant Costs and Consequences for Each Alternative Identified? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | NA | no |
Were Costs and Consequences Measured Accurately in Appropriate Physical Units? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | NA | NA | yes |
Were Costs and Consequences Valued Credibly? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | NA | NA | yes |
Were Costs and Consequences Adjusted for Differential Timing? |
yes | yes | no | yes | NA | yes | yes | NA | NA | NA |
Was an Incremental Analysis of Costs and Consequences of Alternatives Performed? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | NA | NA | NA |
Was Allowance Made for Uncertainty in the Estimates of Costs and Consequences? |
no | no | no | yes | NA | no | no | NA | NA | NA |
Did the Presentation and Discussion of Study Results Include All Issues of Concern to Users? |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | Yes |
Score | 9 from 10 | 9 from 10 | 7 form 10 | 10 from 10 | 8 from 10 | 9 from 10 | 8 from 10 | 4 from 10 | 4 from 10 | 5 from 10 |