Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;19(15):3274. doi: 10.3390/s19153274

Table A1.

Comparison of different approaches. Legend:: Invasive: Approaches which requires surgery to put markers for tracking, semi-invasive: Approaches which do not need surgery for marker insertion, non-invasive: no marker needed. Real time means that the system can process frames at the same rate they are being acquired. If it needs specialized equipment apart from standard video cameras and housing setup, it is pointed out in the last column.

Type Code Availability Performance Real Time or Offline Need Specialized Setup & Invasiveness
[59] Commercial Paid Comparison with ground truth not provided. One paper reports the reproducibility: 2.65% max SD Yes Yes
[71] Commercial Paid Comparison with ground truth not provided. One paper reports the reproducibility: 1.57% max SD Yes Yes
[49] Research data and code for demo available at http://bit.do/eTTai tracking performance not reported, behavioral classification of 12 traits reported to be max at 71% Tracking real time, classification offline yes
[51] Research not available tracking: SD of only 0.034% when compared with ground truth, Max SD of 1.71 degrees in estimating joint angle real time legs and joints tracking yes, invasive
[52] Research not available tracking performance not reported explicitly real time whisker tracking yes, semi-invasive
[53] Research available on request whisker tracking performance not reported explicitly real time single whisker tracking yes, semi-invasive
[54] Research not available head motion tracked correctly with a max false positive of 13% real time head and snout tracking yes, semi-invasive
[55] Research not available head motion tracked continuously with a reported SD of only 0.5 mm real time head and snout tracking yes, semi-invasive
[57] Research not available head motion tracked with an accuracy of 96.3% and the tracking can be reproduced over multiple studies with a correlation coefficient of 0.78 real time head tracking yes, semi-invasive
[89] Research code and demo data available at https://goo.gl/vYaYPy they reported a correlation between whisking amplitude and velocity as a measure of reliability, R = 0.89 Offline head and whisker tracking no, invasive
[90] Research not available Tracking and gait prediction with confidence of 95%, deviation between human annotator and computer at 8% Offline yes, semi-invasive
[93] Research not available Paw tracked with an accuracy of 88.5 on transparent floor and 83.2% on opaque floor Offline yes, semi-invasive
[95] Research code available at https://goo.gl/58DQij tail and paws tracked with an accuracy >90% Real time yes, semi-invasive
[97] Research not available 5 class behavioral classification problem, accuracy in bright condition is 95.34 and in dark conditions is 89.4% offline yes, non-invasive
[100]  Research not available 6 behavioral class accuracy: 66.9%, 4 behavioral class accuracy: 76.3% offline yes, non-invasive
[98]  Research code available at https://goo.gl/eY2Yza whisker detection rate: 76.9%, peak spatial error in whisker detection: 10 pixels offline yes, non-invasive
[101]  Research not available Peak deviation between human annotator and automated annotation: 0.5 mm with a camera of 6 pixel/mm resolution offline yes, non-invasive
[92] Research not available Tracking accuracy >90% after the algorithm was assisted by human users in 3–5% of the frames offline yes, semi-invasive
[105]  Research code available at https://goo.gl/Gny89o A max deviation of 17.7% between human and automated whisker annotation offline yes, non-invasive
[107]  Research not available Maximum paw detection error: 5.9%, minimum error : 0.4% offline no, non-invasive
[110]  Research Source code at https://goo.gl/zesyez, demo data at https://goo.gl/dn2L3y Behavioral classification: 1% false positive rate offline no, semi-invasive
[108]  Research Source code available at https://goo.gl/JCv3AV Whisker tracing accuracy: max error of 0.45 pixels offline no, non-invasive
[116]  Research not available Correlation with annotated data; for whiskers r = 0.78, for limbs r = 0.85 real time no, non-invasive
[109]  Research code available at https://goo.gl/V54mpL Velocity calculated by AGATHA was off from manually calculated velocity by 1.5% real time no, non-invasive
[117]  Research code available at http://bit.ly/2vgJUbr Detected pose matched ground truth with an accuracy of 4.17±0.32 pixels real time on GPUs no, non-invasive
[119]  Research code available at https://bit.ly/2XuJmPv No performance metric reported offline no, non-invasive