Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;26(8-9):778–786. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz044

Table 2.

Summary data on rates of smoking documentation and quit line referral for both healthcare systems

6 Months Preimplementation
6 Months Postimplementation
Adult Patient Volume Asked About Tobacco Current Smokers Adult Patient Volume Asked About Tobacco Current Smokers Smokers Referred to Quitline Referred Connecting With Quitlinea
Healthcare System A
F2Q 19 915 18 268 (96.2) 3060 (16.1) 18 917 18 434 (97.5) 3020 (16.0) 115 (3.8) 39 (33.9)
eRef 23 295 23 197 (99.6) 3387 (14.5) 23 241 23 183 (99.8) 3415 (14.7) 610 (17.9) 184 (30.2)
F2Q vs eRef χ2 1075.0** 5.7* 435.1** 12.9* 315.3** 0.5
Healthcare System B
F2Q 30 320 29 889 (98.6) 4703 (15.5) 28 030 2761 (98.5) 4135 (14.8) 216 (5.2) 82 (38.0)
eRef 30 206 29 705 (98.3) 4737 (15.7) 27 030 26 455 (97.9) 4066 (15.0) 770 (18.9) 216 (28.1)
F2Q vs eRef χ2 14.2* 0.3 32.6* 0.9 363.2** 7.4*

Values are n (%).

eRef = electronic health record–based referral; FTQ: fax-to-quit.

a

Rate of connecting with the quitline reflects the proportion of patients who accepted a quitline call and at least started quitline registration. It does not necessarily reflect engaging in treatment.

*

P < .05.

**

P < .0001.