Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 15;137(11):1223–1231. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3095

Table 1. Synopsis of Different Subject Areasa.

Subject Area FAP, % Prestige Index FAOR Female Representation at Prestigious Authorships Sex-Specific Differences in Citation Rates
First Authorship Coauthorship Last Authorship Tripletb Multiauthor Articles Highest-Impact Journals
Nursingc 75.2 0.23 1.69 0.85 0.85 (+, −, −) Stable Stable No
Q1-dermatology12,d 43.0 −0.11 1.41 1.07 0.60 (+, +, −) Stable Stable Minor
Ophthalmology 34.9 −0.22 1.12 1.20 0.63 (+, +, −) Stable Stable Minor
Otorhinolaryngologyc 31.1 −0.26 1.17 1.25 0.59 (+, +, −) Decline Stable Minor
Nature Index journals5,e 29.8 −0.42 1.19 1.35 0.47 (+, +, −) Sharp decline Decline Major

Abbreviations: FAP, proportion of female authorships; FAOR, female authorship odds ratio; Q1, top quartile.

a

In comparison with other disciplines, the integration of female scientists in ophthalmic research is average. Nevertheless, all subjects provide a considerable career dichotomy, with many female scholars at the beginning of their careers and few women in senior academic positions.

b

The symbols in parentheses indicate higher (+), equal (=), or lower (−) female odds ratios for first authorships, coauthorships, and last authorships.

c

See eFigures 10-19 in the Supplement.

d

The journals constitute the subset of dermatological Q1 journals representing the top 25% of the corresponding impact factor distribution (in 2016).

e

The Nature Index was created in 2014 and offers a database for the specific analysis of global high-impact scientific efforts from the journal categories of Life Science, Multidisciplinary, Earth and Environmental, Chemistry, and Physics.