Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 Nov 20;78(4):1442–1451. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26554

Table 3.

Patient SNR and CNR

Suppression Method SNR
CNR
Infarct (n = 6) Fat (n = 16) Normal
Myocardium (n = 16)
Infarct: Normal
Myocardium (n = 6)
Fat: Normal Myocardium
(n = 16)
Control 20.6 ± 13.3 24.7 ± 15.2 4.8 ± 2.3 15.5 ± 9.9 19.8 ± 13.2
Single-dummy 19.8 ± 12.5 24.6 ± 14.1 4.5 ± 3.3 15.8 ± 10.2 19.8 ± 11.6
SPPRESSa 20.1 ± 8.1 25.1 ± 15.8 4.7 ± 2.4 15.2 ± 6.2 20.2 ± 13.9

Numbers are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

a

All values for SPPRESS were not significantly different from single-dummy or control (P > 0.40 for all pairwise comparisons). CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; SPPRESS, saturation post-pulse readout to eliminate spurious signal.