Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Jan 20;54(3):382–403. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1532280

Table 3:

Simulation results: Biases and coverage rates of µρw (average within-person relation) estimates when µρw = 0, N = 100, and one predictor is included.

T Individual differences in within-person relations exist No individual differences in within-person relations

Bias Coverage rates (%) Bias Coverage rates (%)

All 5 methods MG1 MG2 MG3 MPS MEB All 4 methods MG1 MG2 MG3 MPS
Between-person differences in within-person standard deviations of X and Y exist
5 0.00 94.5 94.5 94.9 95.4 34.2 0.00 91.1 91.1 87.7 91.8
10 0.00 94.1 94.1 93.9 94.4 44.6 0.00 93.9 93.9 92.2 94.0
20 0.00 94.0 94.0 93.7 94.1 63.4 0.00 93.2 93.2 92.4 94.6
30 0.00 93.7 93.7 93.9 93.8 75.8 0.00 94.6 94.6 94.3 95.9
56 0.00 95.3 95.3 95.6 94.7 85.7 0.00 93.4 93.4 93.3 94.9
100 0.00 95.3 95.3 95.4 94.6 91.8 0.00 93.3 93.3 93.3 96.2

Between-person differences in within-person standard deviations exist for Y but not for X
5 0.00 93.2 93.2 93.9 93.2 31.0 0.00 95.5 95.5 93.7 92.0
10 0.00 95.1 95.1 95.2 95.9 48.0 0.00 95.8 95.8 94.8 94.6
20 0.00 94.4 94.4 94.4 94.3 67.9 0.00 94.9 94.9 94.6 94.1
30 0.00 94.9 94.9 95.0 94.3 74.8 0.00 94.9 94.9 94.6 95.9
56 0.00 95.5 95.5 95.5 94.6 87.1 0.00 94.3 94.3 94.3 93.2
100 0.00 95.2 95.2 95.2 95.3 92.0 0.00 95.7 95.7 95.6 95.5

Between-person differences in within-person standard deviations of X and Y do not exist
5 0.00 94.0 94.0 94.1 95.3 32.9 0.00 95.7 95.7 92.8 92.5
10 0.00 94.5 94.5 94.5 94.4 53.6 0.00 95.6 95.6 94.5 94.7
20 0.00 94.3 94.3 94.2 93.7 70.7 0.00 95.9 95.9 95.4 96.0
30 0.00 95.5 95.5 95.6 95.4 83.0 0.00 95.1 95.1 94.5 94.6
56 0.00 93.7 93.7 93.7 94.1 86.1 0.00 95.4 95.4 95.2 94.9
100 0.00 94.3 94.3 94.3 94.2 90.8 0.00 95.6 95.6 95.6 96.1

Note: MG1: the person-mean centering (P-C) model in Eq (2) followed by global standardization in Eq (5); MG2: the P-C model in Eq (2) followed by global standardization in Eq (6); MG3: the P-C model in Eq (4) followed by global standardization in Eq (7); MPS : the P-S standardization approach in Eq (9); MEB: the P-C model in Eq (2) with EB standardization.