Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;13(3):034110. doi: 10.1063/1.5085346

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

(a) Representative bright-field images of highly metastatic PC3, moderately metastatic DU145, and normal RWPE-1 prostate cells in control iso-osmotic (ctrl) and hypo-osmotic (hypo) media for 12 h. Arrows indicate blebs, scale bars represent 40μm. Images were linearly contrast enhanced by stretching gray scale values from the ranges [11, 199] (ctrl) and [0, 153] (hypo) to [0, 255] for PC3; [0, 130] (ctrl) and [22,210] (hypo) to [0,255] for DU145; and [0,163] (ctrl and hypo) to [0,255] for RWPE-1. Displayed images are cropped. (b) The average percentage of cells ± SD that formed blebs in hypo-osmotic media for 12 h in comparison with control, #p=0.036, ##p=0.02, *p=0.0075, **p=0.0069, ***p=0.0052, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Highly metastatic PC3 control n=582, PC3 hypo-osmotic n=527, moderately metastatic DU145 control n=1169, DU145 hypo-osmotic n=255, normal RWPE-1 control n=507, RWPE-1 hypo-osmotic n=494. (c) Average viability ± SD of hypo-osmotically treated (12 h) and control cells determined by Trypan blue stain exclusion. N.s. indicates no statistical significance, two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Averages were obtained from 3 independent experiments.