Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Memory. 2019 Jul 22;27(9):1175–1193. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1615511

Table 5.

Fixed Effects (Odds Ratio) for Multilevel Models of Long-term Recall for One-year Delay for Open-ended Recall (Panel a) and Overall Recall (Panel b)

Model
Model 1
(Basic)
Model 2
(Partially adjusted)
Model 3
(Fully adjusted)
Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Panel a: Open-ended recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year 1.96** (1.18–3.25) 1.87** (1.14–3.06) 1.32 (0.65–2.69)
8 year vs 4 year 3.89*** (2.25–6.73) 3.41*** (1.97–5.88) 1.74 (0.55–5.56)
8 year vs 6 year 1.98** (1.13–3.49) 1.82* (1.04–3.14) 1.32 (0.62–2.78)
Wave at Long-term Recall
Wave 4 vs Wave 3 1.59* (1.02–2.49) 1.80** (1.15–2.839) 1.78** (1.13–2.80)
Wave 4 vs Wave 2 2.20*** (1.41–3.44) 2.28*** (1.47–3.52) 2.28*** (1.47–3.53)
Wave 3 vs Wave 2 1.38 (0.91–2.11) 1.26 (0.82–1.94) 1.28 (0.83–1.97)
Thematic Coherence
High vs Low 1.55** (1.11–2.15) 1.46* (1.05–2.04)
Language 1.02 (0.98–1.05)
Factor 1 1.20 (0.96–1.49)
Factor 2 1.03 (0.79–1.35)
Factor 3 1.18 (0.93–1.51)
−2LL 3915.26 3881.38 3905.36
−2LL change 33.88*** 23.98***
Pseudo-AIC 3917.26 3883.38 3907.36
Pseudo-BIC 3919.87 3886.00 3909.98
Panel b: Overall recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year 2.60*** (1.39–4.86) 2.32*** (1.27–4.23) 1.89 (0.76–4.72)
8 year vs 4 year 4.42*** (2.14–9.11) 3.64*** (1.75–7.58) 2.53 (0.54–11.75)
8 year vs 6 year 1.70 (0.77–3.74) 1.57 (0.72–3.42) 1.33 (0.48–3.73)
Wave at Long-term Recall
Wave 4 vs Wave 3 1.42 (0.78–2.59) 1.33 (0.77–2.30) 1.35 (0.78–2.34)
Wave 4 vs Wave 2 1.89^ (0.997–3.60) 2.25** (1.27–3.99) 2.32** (1.30–4.15)
Wave 3 vs Wave 2 1.33 (0.69–2.56) 1.69 (0.92–3.11) 1.72 (0.93–3.19)
Thematic Coherence
High vs Low 2.16*** (1.36–3.40) 1.98** (1.24–3.15)
Language 1.01 (0.97–1.05)
Factor 1 1.16 (0.86–1.56)
Factor 2 0.89 (0.62–1.28)
Factor 3 1.40* (1.002–1.96)
−2LL 4402.04 4396.27 4431.67
−2LL change 5.77* 35.40***
Pseudo-AIC 4404.04 4398.27 4433.67
Pseudo-BIC 4406.65 4400.89 4436.28

Note:

^

p <.10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

Fit Statistics: −2LL = −2 Res Log Pseudo-Likelihood, Pseudo-AIC = Akaike information criterion; Pseudo-BIC = Bayesian information criterion. Bonferroni adjustments were applied for multiple comparisons.