Table 6.

Fixed Effects (Odds Ratio) for Multilevel Models of Long-term Recall for Two-year Delay for Open-ended Recall (Panel a) and Overall Recall (Panel b)

	Model
	Model 1 (Basic)	Model 2 (Partially adjusted)	Model 3 (Fully adjusted)
	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Panel a: Open-ended recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year	1.45 (0.78–2.70)	1.42 (0.76–2.65)	1.13 (0.45–2.86)
8 year vs 4 year	2.48** (1.32–4.67)	2.30** (1.18–4.50)	1.44 (0.31–6.82)
8 year vs 6 year	1.71 (0.91–3.21)	0.95 (0.85–3.11)	1.28 (0.49–3.37)
Wave at Long-term Recall
Wave 4 vs Wave 3	1.42* (1.01–2.00)	1.33 (0.93–1.89)	1.34 (0.94–1.90)
Thematic Coherence
High vs Low		1.45^ (0.99–2.13)	1.46^ (0.99–2.17)
Language			1.04^ (0.99–1.09)
Factor 1			1.05 (0.82–1.35)
Factor 2			0.90 (0.57–1.42)
Factor 3			0.80 (0.57–1.10)
−2LL	2543.22	2515.21	2536.22
−2LL change		28.01***	21.01***
Pseudo-AIC	2545.22	2517.21	2538.22
Pseudo-BIC	2547.84	2519.83	2540.83
Panel b: Overall recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year	1.42 (0.74–2.74)	1.33 (0.68–2.57)	0.90 (0.33–2.46)
8 year vs 4 year	2.17* (1.09–4.34)	1.84 (0.88–3.82)	0.82 (0.15–4.50)
8 year vs 6 year	1.52 (0.75–3.09)	1.39 (0.67–2.88)	0.91 (0.31–2.69)
Wave at Long-term Recall
Wave 4 vs Wave 3	1.52* (1.06–2.19)	1.48* (1.02–2.14)	1.48* (1.02–2.15)
Thematic Coherence
High vs Low		1.73** (1.15–2.61)	1.72* (1.13–2.62)
Language			1.04 (0.99–1.09)
Factor 1			1.15 (0.87–1.51)
Factor 2			1.06 (0.64–1.73)
Factor 3			0.88 (0.62–1.25)
−2LL	2593.61	2574.60	2594.59
−2LL change		19.01***	19.99***
Pseudo-AIC	2595.61	2576.60	2596.59
Pseudo-BIC	2598.22	2579.22	2599.20

Note:

^{^}p <.10;

^*p < .05;

^**p < .01;

^***p < .001.

Fit Statistics: −2LL = −2 Res Log Pseudo-Likelihood, Pseudo-AIC = Akaike information criterion; Pseudo-BIC = Bayesian information criterion. Bonferroni adjustments were applied for multiple comparisons.