Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Memory. 2019 Jul 22;27(9):1175–1193. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1615511

Table 7.

Fixed Effects (Odds Ratio) for Multilevel Models of Long-term Recall for Three-year Delay for Open-ended Recall (Panel A) and Overall Recall (Panel b)

Model
Model 1
(Basic)
Model 2
(Partially adjusted)
Model 3
(Fully adjusted)
Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Panel a: Open-ended recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year 2.26 (0.88–5.81) 2.41^ (0.90–6.48) 2.72 (0.69–10.78)
8 year vs 4 year 2.46^ (0.94–6.44) 1.92 (0.68–5.36) 2.22 (0.18–26.93)
8 year vs 6 year 1.09 (0.46–2.58) 0.80 (0.31–2.04) 0.81 (0.15–4.40)
Thematic Coherence
High vs Low 2.66** (1.43–4.95) 3.03** (1.56–5.89)
Language 0.99 (0.93–1.05)
Factor 1 1.01 (0.64–1.59)
Factor 2 1.23 (0.59–2.59)
Factor 3 0.66 (0.39–1.14)
−2LL 1299.64 1298.82 1311.02
−2LL change 0.82 12.20*
Pseudo-AIC 1301.64 1300.82 1313.02
Pseudo-BIC 1304.25 1303.43 1315.62
Panel b: Overall recall
Age Cohort
6 year vs 4 year 2.43* (1.05–5.61) 2.57* (1.09–6.03) 2.22 (0.69–10.78)
8 year vs 4 year 3.41** (1.43–8.13) 2.71* (1.10–6.66) 2.22 (0.18–26.93)
8 year vs 6 year 1.41 (0.61–3.25) 1.05 (0.44–2.55) 0.81 (0.15–4.40)
Thematic coherence
High vs Low 2.51** (1.41–4.45) 3.03** (1.56–5.89)
Language 0.99 (0.93–1.05)
Factor 1 1.01 (0.64–1.59)
Factor 2 1.23 (0.59–2.59)
Factor 3 0.66 (0.39–1.14)
−2LL 1244.01 1242.15 1259.92
−2LL change 1.86 17.77**
Pseudo-AIC 1246.01 1244.15 1261.92
Pseudo-BIC 1248.62 1246.76 1264.53

Note:

^

p <.10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

Fit Statistics: −2LL = −2 Res Log Pseudo-Likelihood, Pseudo-AIC = Akaike information criterion; Pseudo-BIC = Bayesian information criterion. Bonferroni adjustments were applied for multiple comparisons.