Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;10(48):4973–4986. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27132

Table 4. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for biochemical relapse after prostatectomy for established risk factors and nuclear ELAC2 expression in various scenarios.

Model Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4
Variable Category (N) 8 232 8 362 8 485 8 473
Gleason grade biopsy ≥4+4 vs. 4+3 vs. 3+4 vs. ≤3+3 4.14 (3.63–4.69)***
cT stage T2c vs. T1c 2.23 (1.73–2.71)*** 2.05 (1.63–2.53)***
Preoperative PSA level ≥20 vs. 11–20 vs. 4–10 vs.<4 3.88 (3.19–4.74)*** 2.98 (2.46–3.64)*** 2.08 (1.71–2.53)*** 1.91 (1.57–2.33)***
Nuclear ELAC2 expression Strong vs. mod. vs. weak vs. neg. 1.58 (1.35–1.83)*** 1.42 (1.22–1.64)*** 1.33 (1.15–1.54)** 1.29 (1.11–1.49)**
Gleason grade prostatectomy ≥4+4 vs. 4+3 vs. 3+4 vs. ≤3+3 13.3 (10.9–16.1)*** 6.48 (5.27–7.97)*** 5.40 (4.36–6.70)***
pT stage T4 vs. T3 vs. T2 3.14 (2.77–3.55)*** 2.83 (2.48–3.22)***
Surgical margin status R1 vs. R0 1.40 (1.27–1.54)*** 1.40 (1.27–1.54)***
Nodal stage N+ vs. N0 1.42 (1.24–1.63)***

Scenario 1 combines preoperatively available parameter (preoperative Gleason grade obtained on the original biopsy, clinical tumor (cT) stage, and preoperative PSA) with the postoperative ELAC2 expression at the negative, low (weak and moderate) and strong intensity levels. In scenario 2 the biopsy Gleason is replaced by the Gleason grade obtained on radical prostatectomy (RPE). In scenario 3, cT-stage is superseded by pathological tumor (pT) stage and surgical margin (R) status. In scenario 4 the lymph node (pN) stage is added. Asterisk indicate significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.001, and *** p ≤ 0.0001.