Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;2:314. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0561-9

Table 1.

Photosynthetic electron fluxes and leaf parameters in transgenic and control plants

Parameter Control Control-level FeS FeS-OE
Relative chlorophyll (SPAD) 50.79 ± 1.60 51.56 ± 1.61 51.78 ± 2.06
Leaf thickness, mm 0.76 ± 0.17 0.74 ± 0.12 0.72 ± 0.11
φPSII 0.598 ± 0.010 0.597 ± 0.004 0.624 ± 0.004*
φNPQ 0.205 ± 0.011 0.200 ± 0.005 0.182 ± 0.003*
φNO 0.197 ± 0.002 0.201 ± 0.001 0.194 ± 0.002
Chlorophyll (a+b), g m−2 0.39 ± 0.06 0.38 ± 0.05
Chlorophyll a/b 5.05 ± 0.13 5.10 ± 0.10
Rubisco, g m−2 0.35 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.02

“Control-level FeS”, T2 plants of the line 230(4)-7 with the control plants-levels of Rieske FeS protein; “FeS-OE”, T2 plants of the line 230(4)-7 with higher abundance of Rieske FeS per leaf area. MultispeQ measurements were performed at the incident irradiance of 200 µmol m−2 s−1, mean ± SE, n = 16 (4 biological replicates): φPSII quantum yield of PSII, φNPQ quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching, φNO quantum yield of non-regulatory energy dissipation, SPAD Soil Plant Analysis Development chlorophyll meter. Chlorophyll and Rubisco measurements are mean ± SE, n = 3 biological replicates. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between transgenic and control plants (P < 0.05). Zero(Null)-segregates were used as control plants