Table 1.
Number and type of users involved in the evaluation activities
| Number and gender | Age | Years of Experience | Type of Expertise | IT Literacy (Min 0, Max 3) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||||
| Clinical Focus Group Solution 1 | M = 4;F = 1 | 57 ± 8 | 30 ± 7 | MD = 2, HCM = 2, N/O = 1 | H = 3;M = 1;L = 1 |
| Clinical Focus Group Solution 2 | M = 5, F = 3 | 46 ± 14 | 17 ± 11 | MD = 6, HCM = 1, GP = 1 | H = 2;M = 3;L = 3 |
| Clinical Focus Group Solution 1 and 2 | M = 1;F = 3 | 50 ± 8 | 23 ± 12 | MD = 3, HCM = 1, N/O = 0 | H = 2;M = 2;L = 0 |
| Scientific Focus Group | M = 1;F = 3 | 55 ± 5 | 22 ± 5 | MD = 2, HCM = 1, N/O = 1 | H = 3;M = 1;L = 0 |
| Business Focus Group | M = 13;F = 4 | 46 ± 10 | 19 ± 10 | MD = 0, HCM = 17, N/O = 1 | H = 17;M = 0;L = 0 |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process Solution 1 | M = 2;F = 6 | 47 ± 9 | 20 ± 10 | MD = 3, HCM = 3, N/O = 2 | H = 1;M = 5;L = 0 |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process Solution 2.1 | M = 3;F = 3 | 54 ± 9 | 29 ± 10 | MD = 2, HCM = 1, N/O = 3 | H = 2;M = 6;L = 0 |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process Solution 2.2 | M = 2;F = 6 | 43 ± 12 | 17 ± 11 | MD = 5, HCM = 3, N/O = 0 | H = 0;M = 7;L = 1 |
| Implementation | |||||
| Heuristic Evaluations (Solution 1 and 2) | M = 2,F = 3 | 34 ± 4 | 8 ± 4 | BE (4), GD (1), SWD (2) | H = 5; M = 0;L = 0 |
| Usability Test Solution 1 | M = 3, F = 1 | 46 ± 13 | 14 ± 6 | MD = 2, HCM = 1, N/O = 1 | H = 2; M = 1; L = 1 |
| Usability Test Solution 2 | M = 1, F = 4 | 38 ± 10 | 13 ± 11 | MD = 4, N/O = 1 | H = 1; M = 3; L = 1 |
| Evaluation | |||||
| Solution 1 | M = 1, F = 6 | 42 ± 9 | 14 ± 10 | MD = 6, HCM = 1, N/O = 0 | H = 3; M = 3; L = 1 |
| Solution 2 | M = 3, F = 6 | 41 ± 15 | 13 ± 12 | MD = 6, HCM = 2, N/O = 1 | H = 2; M = 5; L = 2 |
M Male, F Female, BE Biomedical engineer, GD Graphic designer, SWD SoftWare developer, MD Medical doctor, HCM Health care manager, GP General practitioner, N/O Nurses or others; H High, M Medium, L Low