Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;19:299. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2436-y

Table 2.

Pregnant women’s reported receipt of assessment and care for maternal alcohol consumption at initial and subsequent antenatal visits

Element of care reportedly received Initial antenatal visit
(N = 473)
Subsequent antenatal visits (N = 890) Comparison between care at initial and subsequent antenatal visits
n % 95% CI n % 95% CI Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)a p-value
Asked about alcohol consumption 420 88.8 85.63–91.33 127 14.3 12.13–16.72 47.61 (33.82–67.02) p < 0.001
Assessment (AUDIT-C) 304 64.3 59.95–68.59 69 7.8 6.17–9.70 21.40 (15.71–29.16) p < 0.001
Advised safest not to consume 299 63.2 58.86–67.56 141 15.8 13.59–18.39 9.13 (7.04–11.83) p < 0.001
Advised of potential risks 182 38.5 34.09–42.87 187 21.0 18.46–23.81 2.35 (1.84–3.01) p < 0.001
Complete advice (safest not to consume and potential risks) 166 35.1 30.79–39.40 78 8.8 7.08–10.80 5.63 (4.17–7.59) p < 0.001
Referral offered or followed upb 1 50.0 0.00–100.00 0 0.0 0.00–0.00
Complete care (complete advice and referral offered or followed up) 165 34.9 30.58–39.18 77 8.7 6.98–10.68 5.66 (4.19–7.64) p < 0.001
All guideline elements (assessment, complete advice and referral offered or followed up) 132 27.9 23.86–31.95 34 3.8 2.75–5.29 9.75 (6.55–14.50) p < 0.001

aSubsequent visit as Referent

bLimited to women who reported in the survey that they had consumed alcohol at medium or high risk of harm levels since pregnancy recognition (AUDIT-C score ≥ 3) (Initial antenatal visit n = 2; Subsequent visit n = 4). Not included in ‘comparison between care at initial and subsequent antenatal visits’ p-value test due to small sample size