Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;12:6407–6438. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S204340

Table 2.

Summary of analyses for MWA compared with RFA

Outcome Number of studies included in meta-analysis Summary effecta (95% CI); P value Heterogeneity (I2 value)
LTP 18 0.70 (0.53, 0.94); P=0.02 43%
Technique efficacy 18 1.01 (0.99, 1.03); P=0.25 13%
IDL 9 0.93 (0.79, 1.10); P=0.40 43%
EHM 2 0.66 (0.43, 1.01); P=0.06 0%
OS (1-Year) 16 1.00 (0.98, 1.02); P=0.80 26%
OS (3-Year) 14 1.03 (0.97, 1.09); P=0.40 37%
OS (5-Year) 9 1.03 (0.93, 1.13); P=0.60 33%
DFS (1-Year) 8 1.00 (0.96, 1.04); P=0.93 13%
DFS (3-Year) 7 1.05 (0.96, 1.14); P=0.27 0%
DFS (5-Year) 5 0.97 (0.71, 1.33); P=0.86 71%
Length of hospital stay (days) 7 −0.40 (−1.09, 0.29); P=0.26 80%
Complications 16 1.05 (0.77, 1.45); P=0.75 0%

Notes: aRR for MWA versus RFA for all outcomes except length of hospital stay, which is reported as the WMD. Point estimates and CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; IDL, intrahepatic de novo lesions; LTP, local tumor progression; MWA, microwave ablation; OS, overall survival; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; RR, risk ratio; WMD, weighted mean difference.