Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Water Health. 2018 Oct;16(5):711–723. doi: 10.2166/wh.2018.293

Table 1.

Public bathing areas sampled in the summer of 2013 in central and western part of Finland. Characteristics of the bathing area are reported by the local health protection authorities (Valvira, 2015).

Sampling site Type of bathing area Estimated number of bathers / day during the bathing season Bathing water classification* Identified risks for water quality in the bathing water profile Beach facilities Number of samples
A Inland EU bathing area >100 Excellent Runoffs through a nearby stream, waterfowl Sandy beach, toilets, waste bins 3
B Inland EU bathing area up to 400 Sufficient Sewage overflow from a pumping station through rain water pumping station, waterfowl Sandy beach, toilets, park around the beach 4
C Inland EU bathing area up to 1350 Good Cyanobacteria due to the eutrophication, sewage overflows from pumping stations, sewage effluents, runoff from rain water system Two sandy beaches, toilet, wide parks, playground, tennis court 3
D Coastal EU bathing area >100 Poor Waterfowl (gulls), scattered loading, sewage overflows from pumping stations Sandy beach, toilets, waste bins, camping area beside, different activities for users 6
E Coastal small national bathing area not available not available Profile not available. Dense aquatic vegetation in a shallow bay reported, runoffs from nearby streams, waterfowl and sewage discharges not available 5
*

The classification excellent> good> sufficient> poor is based on based on quality results in 2009–2012.