Table 1.
Sampling site | Type of bathing area | Estimated number of bathers / day during the bathing season | Bathing water classification* | Identified risks for water quality in the bathing water profile | Beach facilities | Number of samples |
A | Inland EU bathing area | >100 | Excellent | Runoffs through a nearby stream, waterfowl | Sandy beach, toilets, waste bins | 3 |
B | Inland EU bathing area | up to 400 | Sufficient | Sewage overflow from a pumping station through rain water pumping station, waterfowl | Sandy beach, toilets, park around the beach | 4 |
C | Inland EU bathing area | up to 1350 | Good | Cyanobacteria due to the eutrophication, sewage overflows from pumping stations, sewage effluents, runoff from rain water system | Two sandy beaches, toilet, wide parks, playground, tennis court | 3 |
D | Coastal EU bathing area | >100 | Poor | Waterfowl (gulls), scattered loading, sewage overflows from pumping stations | Sandy beach, toilets, waste bins, camping area beside, different activities for users | 6 |
E | Coastal small national bathing area | not available | not available | Profile not available. Dense aquatic vegetation in a shallow bay reported, runoffs from nearby streams, waterfowl and sewage discharges | not available | 5 |
The classification excellent> good> sufficient> poor is based on based on quality results in 2009–2012.