Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2019 May 17;431(15):2821–2834. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.048

Fig. 3. Anterograde trafficking of Atg9 vesicles is affected in an exocyst mutant.

Fig. 3

(a) WT, atg1Δ, sec32 and sec32atg1Δ cells expressing GFP-Atg9 were grown in SD-Ura and then starved at PT or NPT. Fluorescence imaging was carried out at 0 and 2 h. Deconvolved and maximum intensity projection images are shown. The scale bar represents 2 μm. (b) WT and sec32 cells as in panel a were scored for presence of single bright punctum of GFP-Atg9 at 0 and 2 h in starvation at PT and NPT. (c) Comparison of sec32 and sec32atg1Δ cells showing single punctum of GFP-Atg9 as in panel a. For panels b and c, more than 100 cells per three independent experiments were manually scored and mean values plotted with standard error. (d) WT and sec32cells expressing GFP-Atg9 and Ape1-RFP were starved at PT or NPT. Fluorescence images were captured at 0 and 2 h in SD-N. The scale bar represents 2 μm (merge) and 0.5 μm (zoom). Intensity of GFP-Atg9 at PAS (marked by Ape1-RFP) was measured, and average intensity of GFP-Atg9 is plotted in panel e. (f) The percentage of PAS that colocalizes with bright Atg9 puncta was determined from panel d, and mean values were plotted. Error bars represent S.E.M. Statistical significance was analyzed by Student's unpaired t-test. ns, non-significant; *P < 0.05.