Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 22;149(6):1019–1026. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz013

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of school-age children who participated in observational feeding study to examine the validity of ASA24 (N = 100)1

Characteristic %
Gender, age
 Girl 49
  10 y 3
  11 y 26
  12 y 16
  13 y 4
 Boy 49
  10 y 5
  11 y 20
  12 y 15
  13 y 9
 Other/prefer not to answer 2
  12 y 2
Eating habits2
 Poor 4
 Fair 19
 Good 37
 Very good 21
 Excellent 4
 Don't know/unsure 13
 Prefer not to answer 2
Family affluence3
 Low/medium 23
 High 58
 Not stated 19
Weight perception4
 Underweight 18
 About the right weight 54
 Overweight 11
 Don't know/prefer not to answer 17

1ASA24, Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool; FAS, Family Affluence Scale.

2Eating habits were assessed with use of a self-report item inquiring whether participants considered their eating habits as poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent. The first 2 and the last 2 categories were combined for subsequent analyses.

3Family affluence was assessed with the FAS II (23), based on indicators such as whether the child has their own bedroom, and number of family vehicles. Children were classified as having low/medium (FAS score 0–5) or higher (FAS score 6–9) family-level affluence.

4Weight perception was assessed with use of a self-report measure, whereby children identified perceiving themselves as “very underweight,” “underweight,” “about the right weight,” “overweight,” or “very overweight.” The “underweight” and “overweight” subcategories were collapsed for subsequent analyses.