Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;20(8):36–46. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12676

Table 3.

Dosimetric results in nominal PB‐PB, PB‐MC, and MC‐MC plans of breast cancer. The results are averaged over ten breast cancer patients.

    PB‐PB
Avg. (range)
PB‐MC
Avg. (range)
P‐value MC‐MC
Avg. (range)
P‐value
CTV_Total D99% (%) 95.5 (91.6–98.8) 90.4 (87.9–92.6) <0.001 94.1 (92.1–98.1) 0.174
D95% (%) 97.5 (94.8–99.6) 93.5 (91.4–95.1) <0.001 97.1 (94.6–99.3) 0.385
Dmean (%) 100.3 (98.4–101.5) 97.6 (95.3–98.6) <0.001 100 (98.2–101.2) 0.290
D2% (%) 102.6 (100.2–104.3) 101.6 (98.0–104.1) 0.112 102.7 (100.1–104.6) 0.821
Heart Dmean (Gy(RBE)) 0.45 (0.12–1.07) 0.47 (0.1–0.95) 0.762 0.47 (0.11–1.05) 0.970
LAD Dmean (Gy(RBE)) 3.37 (0.43–9.21) 3.10 (0.43–9.06) 0.764 3.64 (0.33–11.17) 0.910
Esophagus Dmean (Gy(RBE)) 6.02 (3.33–17.24) 5.94 (3.63–17.53) 0.705 6.28 (3.71–19.26) 0.850
Skin Dmax (%) 100.2 (94.6–103.1) 101.2 (95.2–105.8) 0.290 100.9 (94.8–104) 0.406
Left lung V20 (%) 12.4 (2.2–22.7) 13.9 (2.6–25.3) 0.406 13.1 (4.9–24.5) 0.597
Left lung V5 (%) 32.8 (21.6–47.5) 37.6 (26.7–53.4) 0.082 36.8 (31.1–51.9) 0.049
Right lung V5 (%) 1.7 (0–9.4) 0.9 (0–4.1) 0.597 1.1 (0–4.2) 0.940

PB‐PB, PB optimization followed by PB dose calculation; PB‐MC, PB optimization followed by MC dose calculation; MC‐MC, MC optimization followed by MC dose calculation; CTV, clinical target volume; LAD, left anterior descending artery; RBE, relative biological effectiveness.

P‐value for PB‐MC vs. PB‐PB.

P‐value for MC‐MC vs. PB‐PB.