Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;20(8):36–46. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12676

Table 4.

EUD of CTV_AxI, CTV_AxII, and CTV_AxIII in nominal PB‐PB, PB‐MC, and MC‐MC plans of breast cancer.

Patient # CTV_AxI CTV_AxII CTV_AxIII
EUD (Gy(RBE) EUD (Gy(RBE) EUD (Gy(RBE)
PB‐PB PB‐MC MC‐MC PB‐PB PB‐MC MC‐MC PB‐PB PB‐MC MC‐MC
1 51.7 49.6 51.7 51.6 50.4 51.6 50.9 50.0 50.9
2 51.8 49.9 51.4 51.7 49.8 51.3 51.4 50.0 51.1
3 50.6 48.2 50.5 50.6 48.8 50.5 50.6 49.1 50.5
4 50.5 48.9 49.5 50.5 49.3 49.5 49.9 47.3 49.7
5 51.6 49.2 51.4 51.8 50.3 51.7 51.3 49.5 50.8
6 49.9 47.7 49.8 49.8 47.4 49.8 49.9 47.3 49.7
7 50.8 47.1 50.9 50.8 48.6 50.8 50.8 48.6 50.8
8 51.2 49.0 50.3 51.2 49.4 50.3 51.2 49.6 50.2
9 51.0 49.2 50.2 50.9 49.2 50.0 50.8 49.2 49.8
10 50.8 48.6 50.8 50.7 48.8 50.7 50.7 48.6 50.7
Average 51.0 48.7 50.7 51.0 49.2 50.6 50.7 48.9 50.4
SD 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.5
P‐value   <0.001 0.271   <0.001 0.272   0.001 0.162

PB‐PB, PB optimization followed by PB dose calculation; PB‐MC, PB optimization followed by MC dose calculation; MC‐MC, MC optimization followed by MC dose calculation; CTV, clinical target volume, EUD, equivalent uniform dose; RBE, relative biological effectiveness.

P‐value for PB‐MC vs. PB‐PB.

P‐value for MC‐MC vs. PB‐PB.