Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;20(8):36–46. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12676

Table 6.

Tumor control probability results in nominal PB‐PB, PB‐MC, and MC‐MC plans of breast cancer. The results are averaged over ten breast cancer patients.

    PB‐PB
Avg. (±SD)
PB‐MC
Avg. (±SD)
P‐value MC‐MC
Avg. (±SD)
P‐value
CTV_Total TCP (%) 93.2 (±0.6) 91.4 (±0.7) <0.001 92.9 (±0.6) 0.345
CTV_CW/Breast TCP (%) 92.9 (±0.9) 91.2 (±1.2) 0.002 92.7 (±0.7) 0.535
CTV_AxI TCP (%) 93.4 (±0.5) 91.5 (±1.0) <0.001 93.2 (±0.6) 0.545
CTV_AxII TCP (%) 93.3 (±0.7) 91.8 (±0.9) 0.002 93.1 (±0.7) 0.571
CTV_AxIII TCP (%) 93.4 (±0.5) 91.7 (±0.9) 0.001 93.1 (±0.6) 0.326
CTV_IMN TCP (%) 93.0 (±1.3) 90.2 (±2.1) 0.003 92.9 (±1.4) 0.940
CTV_SCVN TCP (%) 93.4 (±0.7) 90.5 (±1.2) <0.001 93.1 (±0.7) 0.385

PB‐PB, PB optimization followed by PB dose calculation; PB‐MC, PB optimization followed by MC dose calculation; MC‐MC, MC optimization followed by MC dose calculation; CW, chestwall; EUD, equivalent uniform dose; IMN, internal mammary nodes; SCVN, supraclavicular nodes; TCP, tumor control probability.

P‐value for PB‐MC vs. PB‐PB.

P‐value for MC‐MC vs. PB‐PB.