Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 28;20(8):141–154. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12662

Table 5.

Twofold cross‐validation results for the two pixel‐level bleeding detection datasets. The performance measures are presented in the original/ flipped order regarding the selected training and test sets.

Color features Texture features Classifier PREC REC SPEC ACC F1 MCC ROC PRC
None All RT 0.882/0.851 0.875/0.854 0.762/0.745 0.875/0.854 0.878/0.852 0.607/0.620 0.818/0.800 0.850/0.800
All None RT 0.936/0.921 0.934/0.922 0.873/0.864 0.934/0.922 0.935/0.922 0.787/0.800 0.903/0.893 0.914/0.887
All All RT 0.958/0.943 0.957/0.944 0.911/0.898 0.957/0.944 0.957/0.943 0.859/0.856 0.934/0.921 0.941/0.916
All Five top RT 0.959/0.944 0.958/0.944 0.918/0.896 0.958/0.944 0.958/0.944 0.863/0.857 0.938/0.920 0.943/0.916
All Five different RT 0.958/0.946 0.958/0.946 0.912/0.903 0.958/0.946 0.958/0.946 0.861/0.862 0.935/0.925 0.941/0.920
All All RF 0.971/0.957 0.970/0.957 0.946/0.924 0.970/0.957 0.971/0.957 0.903/0.890 0.993/0.985 0.992/0.985
All Five top RF 0.970/0.955 0.969/0.955 0.945/0.919 0.969/0.955 0.969/0.955 0.899/0.886 0.992/0.984 0.990/0.984
All Five different RF 0.971/0.956 0.970/0.956 0.945/0.922 0.970/0.956 0.970/0.956 0.902/0.888 0.993/0.984 0.991/0.984
All All LMT 0.968/0.955 0.968/0.956 0.940/0.923 0.968/0.956 0.968/0.955 0.894/0.887 0.989/0.982 0.984/0.983
All Five top LMT 0.969/0.954 0.968/0.955 0.944/0.918 0.968/0.955 0.968/0.954 0.896/0.884 0.988/0.982 0.979/0.981
All Five different LMT 0.968/0.954 0.967/0.954 0.939/0.920 0.967/0.954 0.967/0.954 0.893/0.883 0.988/0.983 0.977/0.983
ZeroR 0.665/0.533 0.816/0.730 0.184/0.270 0.816/0.730 0.733/0.616 0.000/0.000 0.500/0.500 0.699/0.605

PREC, precision; REC, sensitivity or recall; SPEC, specificity; F1, F‐Measure; ACC, accuracy; MCC, Matthews correlation coefficient; ROC, receiver operator characteristic curve; PRC, precision‐recall curve; RT, Random tree; LMT, logistic model tree.