Table 2.
Lexical diversity |
Sophistication |
Phonological word features |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTLD | HD-D | Maas | PCA component (lexical diversity) | Lexical sophistication | Number of phonemes | Phonological neighborhood density | Word-average biphoneme probability | PCA component (phonological word features) | |
Number of produced words | 0.718⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.772⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.008/ 0.950 | 0.576⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.029/ 0.828 | 0.300⁎/ 0.022 | 0.026/ 0.026 | 0.105/ 0.433 | 0.166/ 0.213 |
MTLD | 0.945⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.525⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.936⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.073/ 0.587 | 0.536⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.182/ 0.171 | −0.012/. 931 | 0.317⁎/ 0.015 | |
HD-D | −0.522⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.928⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.102/ 0.448 | 0.578⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.223/ 0.092 | 0.006/ 0.967 | 0.353⁎⁎/ 0.007 | ||
Maas | −0.748⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.419⁎⁎/ 0.001 | −0.595⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.586⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.161/ 0.226 | −0.543⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | |||
PCA component (lexical diversity) | 0.213/ 0.108 | 0.619⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.352⁎⁎/ 0.007 | 0.043/ 0.747 | 0.437⁎⁎/ 0.001 | ||||
Lexical sophistication | 0.433⁎⁎/ 0.001 | −0.436⁎⁎/. 001 | 0.380⁎⁎/ 0.003 | 0.502⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | |||||
Number of phonemes | −0.767⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.469⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | 0.898⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | ||||||
Phonological neighborhood density | −0.464⁎⁎/ <0.0001 | −0.868⁎⁎/ <0.001 | |||||||
Word-average biphoneme probability | 0.732⁎⁎/ <0.0001 |
HD-D = hypergeometric distribution of the lexical diversity measure “D”; MTLD = measure of textual lexical diversity; PCA component = the 1st principal component; SD = standard deviation.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).