Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 21;2019:7032581. doi: 10.1155/2019/7032581

Table 3.

Influence of electroacupuncture on PSQI scores.

Aspects (Deteriorated vs. Improved) Independent Variable Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Sleep latency Treatment vs. Control 1.26 0.42 3.59 .672
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 0.57 0.15 2.17 .409
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 0.75 0.22 2.54 .638
Sleep duration Treatment vs. Control 1.18 0.40 3.45 .763
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 0.51 0.11 2.34 .389
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 0.51 0.12 2.10 .350
Habitual sleep efficiency Treatment vs. Control 0.46 0.11 1.96 .292
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 0.35 0.07 1.71 .196
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 1.47 0.30 7.26 .636
Sleep disturbance Treatment vs. Control 0.55 0.10 3.01 .487
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 1.05 0.09 12.98 .968
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 0.35 0.05 2.73 .318
Subjective sleep quality Treatment vs. Control 0.97 0.33 2.86 .954
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 1.45 0.38 5.46 .583
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 1.11 0.36 3.45 .851
Use of sleep medication Treatment vs. Control 1.34 0.42 4.27 .623
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 2.21 0.52 9.38 .281
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 1.69 0.49 5.85 .405
Daytime Dysfunction Treatment vs. Control 0.79 0.22 2.84 .720
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 0.37 0.07 1.81 .218
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 0.79 0.18 3.37 .748
Total score Treatment vs. Control 1.11 0.43 2.87 .836
Heroin dosage increase vs. remain 1.42 0.45 4.51 .551
Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain 3.40 1.16 9.97 .026

Control variables: age, sex, educational level, and marital status.