Tanvetyanon et al. (14) |
A systematic review of quality of life associated with standard chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. |
To evaluate the effect of standard chemotherapy regimens. |
January 1966–May 2006 |
No large varieties between chemotherapies have been found. HRQoL outcome comparisons are hardly feasible due to heterogeneity and low compliance to HRQoL evaluations. |
Focuses solely on chemotherapy. Only 13 articles are included. |
Pat et al. (15) |
Systematic review of symptom control and quality of life in studies on chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: how CONSORTed are the data? |
To evaluate compliance to the CONSORT checklist in RCT comparing chemotherapy. |
1980–August 2005 |
Compliance to CONSORT is reasonable. Large differences between journals and no improvements were found. |
Focuses solely on chemotherapy. |
Claassens et al. (16) |
Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: an update of a systematic review on methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials. |
To evaluate HRQoL measurements |
2002–2010 |
Incorporation of HRQoL endpoints has increased. Quality of HRQoL methodology reporting has improved, however specific domains remain inadequately reported. |
Focuses on the qualitative aspects of HRQoL reporting. |
Matsuda et al. (17) |
Quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. |
To provide an overview of HRQoL in chemotherapy trials. |
Until April 2010 |
Carboplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with better global QoL than cisplatin-based chemotherapy. |
Focuses on the comparison of carboplatin- to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Only 6 trials are included. |
Ganguli et al. (18) |
The impact of second-line agents on patients' health-related quality of life in the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. |
To assess HRQoL in second-line treatment trials. |
2000–2010 |
Improvement in overall QoL were inconsistent. Large varieties in methodology hinders comparisons. |
Focuses solely on second-line chemotherapy. |
Saad et al. (19) |
Assessment of quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an overview of recent randomized trials. |
To provide an overview of trials with HRQoL endpoints. |
1997–2009 |
The majority of trials incorporate HRQoL endpoint. Almost half of included trials reported a significant difference. |
Articles published only in 13 leading journals. |
Damm et al. (3) |
Health-related quality of life questionnaires in lung cancer trials: a systematic literature review. |
To evaluate the HRQoL measurements used in trials. |
2001–2011 |
Wide range of HRQoL questionnaires was used. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module was the most frequently used. |
Focuses mainly on HRQoL questionnaires. |
Mannion et al. (20) |
Effect of chemotherapy on quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. |
To evaluate HRQoL in palliative chemotherapy trials. |
1987–2011 |
QoL is an important outcome in advanced NSCLC. |
Focuses solely on chemotherapy. |
Fiteni et al. (21) |
Methodology of health-related quality of life analysis in phase III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer clinical trials: a critical review. |
To evaluate the methodology of HRQoL analysis and reporting in phase III first-line chemotherapy trials. |
2008–2014 |
Shortcomings and heterogeneity in measurement, analysis and reporting of HRQoL. Comparisons of HRQoL between trials remains therefore difficult. |
Focuses on the methodology of HRQoL analysis in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy. |
Bouazza et al. (22) |
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: a systematic review. |
To describe and compare available PROMs. |
January 2010–February 2016 |
PROMs are important in clinical practice if introduced adequately. |
Focuses on PROMs rather than HRQoL. |