Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;2019(8):CD011871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011871.pub2

Pakoa 2018.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Cross‐sectional study with unclear sampling method.
Patient characteristics and setting Sample size: 15 cases, 115 non‐cases (total 130)
Clinical presentation: 'Feeling unwell', headache, fever or chills, myalgia or arthralgia, prostration, cough, jaundice, and oliguria or anuria
Risk factors: NR
Region: Port Vila, Vanuatu (island of Efate)
Clinical setting: outpatient clinic at a hospital
Prevalence of leptospirosis: 11.5%
DPO of disease at moment of enrolment: NR
Index tests Index test: real‐time PCR (TaqMan)
Target gene: lipL32 (Stoddard 2009)
Timing of sample collection at # DPO of disease: NR
Cut‐off value: NR
Patient material: serum
Company/brand: inhouse
Frozen samples: unclear
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: leptospirosis
Case definition: MAT positive
Timing of sample collection at # DPO of disease (MAT): NR
Single or paired sera (MAT): single
Cut‐off value (MAT): ≥ 1:800
Patient material (MAT): serum
Flow and timing 31 people not included because the amount of serum was not enough for MAT.
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a 2‐gate case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test Real‐time PCR
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? No    
Does the index test, its conduct and interpretation, match the review question? Unclear    
Is the execution of the test reported in such detail that reproduction is possible? No    
    High High
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is this the type of test that is likely to correctly classify the target condition? No    
Did the execution of the MAT include paired samples? No    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
Does the case definition match the review question? Yes    
Is the execution of the test reported in such detail that reproduction is possible? Yes    
    High Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive a reference standard? No    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    High