Pakoa 2018.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Cross‐sectional study with unclear sampling method. | ||
Patient characteristics and setting | Sample size: 15 cases, 115 non‐cases (total 130) Clinical presentation: 'Feeling unwell', headache, fever or chills, myalgia or arthralgia, prostration, cough, jaundice, and oliguria or anuria Risk factors: NR Region: Port Vila, Vanuatu (island of Efate) Clinical setting: outpatient clinic at a hospital Prevalence of leptospirosis: 11.5% DPO of disease at moment of enrolment: NR |
||
Index tests |
Index test: real‐time PCR (TaqMan) Target gene: lipL32 (Stoddard 2009) Timing of sample collection at # DPO of disease: NR Cut‐off value: NR Patient material: serum Company/brand: inhouse Frozen samples: unclear |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: leptospirosis Case definition: MAT positive Timing of sample collection at # DPO of disease (MAT): NR Single or paired sera (MAT): single Cut‐off value (MAT): ≥ 1:800 Patient material (MAT): serum |
||
Flow and timing | 31 people not included because the amount of serum was not enough for MAT. | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Unclear | ||
Was a 2‐gate case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test Real‐time PCR | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | No | ||
Does the index test, its conduct and interpretation, match the review question? | Unclear | ||
Is the execution of the test reported in such detail that reproduction is possible? | No | ||
High | High | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is this the type of test that is likely to correctly classify the target condition? | No | ||
Did the execution of the MAT include paired samples? | No | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Unclear | ||
Does the case definition match the review question? | Yes | ||
Is the execution of the test reported in such detail that reproduction is possible? | Yes | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive a reference standard? | No | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | No | ||
High |