Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;2019(7):CD012937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012937.pub2

Comparison 1. Routine monitoring of gastric residuals versus no monitoring of gastric residuals.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of infants with NEC stage 2 or 3 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.07 [0.50, 18.77]
2 Time to reach full enteral feeds 2 141 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.92 [2.06, 5.77]
3 Number of infants with surgical NEC 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.36, 4.32]
4 Time to regain birth weight (days) 1 80 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.70 [0.01, 3.39]
5 Number of infants with extrauterine growth restriction at discharge 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.75, 1.05]
6 Number of infants with episodes of interruption of feeds (lasting ≥ 12 hours) 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.07 [1.39, 3.07]
7 Number of TPN days 2 141 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.29 [1.66, 4.92]
8 Number of infants with parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease 1 61 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.28, 3.76]
9 Number of days of CVL usage 1 61 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.70 [‐1.99, 13.39]
10 Number of infants with invasive infection 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.85, 2.52]
11 All‐cause mortality before discharge 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.36, 4.32]
12 Duration of hospital stay (days) 1 80 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.20 [‐4.45, 10.85]