Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;2019(7):CD012937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012937.pub2

Comparison 2. Using two different criteria of gastric residual for feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of infants with NEC stage 2 or 3 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.35 [0.26, 108.27]
2 TIme to reach full enteral feeds 1 87 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.91, 0.71]
3 Number of infants with surgical NEC 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.35 [0.26, 108.27]
4 Time to regain birth weight (days) 1 87 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [‐0.37, 2.37]
5 Number of infants with extrauterine growth restriction at discharge 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.14, 2.01]
6 Number of infants with episodes of interruption of feeds (lasting ≥ 12 hours) 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.21 [0.13, 76.67]
7 Number of TPN days 1 87 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [‐0.78, 2.38]
8 Number of infants with Invasive Infection 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.35 [0.26, 108.27]
9 All‐cause mortality before discharge 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.21 [0.13, 76.67]