White 2010.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study described as randomised, method of random sequence generation not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Blinding of participants | High risk | Author replied to email stating neither participants or personnel were blinded |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Blinding of personnel | High risk | Author replied to email stating neither participants or personnel were blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcome | Low risk | Objective measures (ED visits, hospitalisations) used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | Subjective measures using self‐report at high risk of bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |